A year or so ago, my Synology NAS got hacked by a Bitcoin mining virus. I only discovered it because a tech blogger tweeted about it and I happened to see it.
![]()
La solution ciel 2017 fr iso keygen gratuit Le ciel attendra french dvdrip 2016: films: la. Fr iso.tv samsung qled the frame, tv sony oled a1, tv lg oled 2017, photo leica. Synology Surveillance Station 6 License Cracked Tongue And Diabetes.
My Synology was out of date and the virus must have exploited a vulnerability without any action on my part. Without knowing what to look for, the virus was effectively invisible. Given that I'm probably in the top 1% of tech savvy people, imagine how many others must have gotten infected!
![]()
(I contacted Synology tech support and suggested that they send out an e-mail to their users, but they never responded.)Unfortunately, last I checked, it's still impossible to have a Synology NAS automatically update itself. That was a kinda 'funny' virus.I got it too.
How did I find about it? The fans kept spinning.Usually my syno is really quiet, you can only hear the drives.
But that mining exploit made the cpu 90% and the fans had to do their job.So after a quick search, I discovered what it was all about, and some days later Synology released a nice update that got rid of it.You can't auto update, that's true, but you can receive email alert for each new release of the DSM. You can also do that for each package installed.So, all in all, that good for me: I don't want my NAS to auto update when I'm not there, as I also usually wait a week or two before updating. You do realize that the NSA and it's ilk are military organizations, right? We're (supposed to be) a nation of laws with due process: it's extremely worrisome to a free and open society to have the military go after criminals. That should be handled by law enforcement and the judicial system.You know what would actually be useful though, since we're talking about taxpayers reaping benefits from the government?
How about a non-military government agency that does computer security research, but instead of hoarding all the exploits, they share them with the public through well-financed and organized open source projects? I happily run OpenBSD as my firewall. It's developed by competent people who care about what they are doing and who take pride in their work. But it's general purpose Unix, it's not just a firewall or router.Which means that it's more work to administer than something developed as a dedicated router or firewall.Also I'm running on a generic x86 computer. I pay about $1/yr per watt drawn 24x7, which means my firewall costs me about $80/yr just in electricity. A smaller 'appliance' type firewall would certainly have much lower operating costs.Sorry I don't have any suggestions more tailored to your request.
I'm just letting you know what works for me. Me1010 beat me to it, I didn't know that HN keeps people from posting too often. It imposes a timeout! Anyway, here's my post, same cost info as he has. But I also had a discussion of power in various areas:Portland Oregon metro area. Unfortunately for pricing the utility is Portland General Electric. Some places in the area have 'people's utility districts', i.e.
Publicly owned. Those get preferential pricing from the govt, i.e. Bonneville Power.
And the price per kWH is of course variable like in most communities (e.g. Because of lifeline pricing).Overall I'm paying about $0.12 per kWH.
There are 24x30x12 hours in a year = 8640 hours. Therefore a kilowatt costs $1037 per year. Approximately.I'm relatively happy, all things considered. It would suck to live in the People's Republic of California. My understanding is that peak pricing in some communities there could be 3x or more than what I'm paying. I'm guessing this only affects you if you have their EZ-Internet service enabled that exposes the NAS to the public internet. Or if you exposed it yourself on your firewall.I've had a Synology NAS for almost a year now.
Synology DSM is a GNU/Linux distro. It runs the exact same stuff as any other distro, including the kernel and all services and the filesystem.
The only differences between building your own NAS with a good server distro like Debian 'stable' and running a 'commercial' Synology box are:1. The client interface to the NAS.2. The 'cloud' services.Only #1 is actually a deliverable with the Synology NAS. And #2 presents a terribly broken privacy policy.For myself, I'd much rather be running something that I know is updating from an authenticated and keyyed repo than something which is attempting to make the user believe that somehow the 'commercial' NAS is magically different than running a regular GNU/Linux distro. He didn't say that he was a Debian maintainer or planning to comment out the two lines and ship it in a distro, misdescribed what he was commenting out, and didn't provide enough context to make it clear that he'd misdescribed it.
(Even knowing what functions the lines he was commenting out were in would probably have been enough to ring alarm bells.)There's a limit to how much effort the OpenSSL developers should have to put into stopping people from shooting themselves in the foot, and tracking down lines of code identified only by their line number in an unspecified version of OpenSSL to make sure they do what some random guy on the mailing list thinks they do is way over that limit. I'm not sure what you mean.Are you comparing the Synology GNU/Linux distro to Debian or some generic non-Debian distro to Debian?If you are comparing Synology to Debian, then the 'trusted' source argument is entirely flawed. The source, meaning both source code and source of software, of software running on Synology hardware is not Synology. Synology only makes the GUI client that runs on your machine that locally interfaces to the NAS box.As to the Debian 2006 SSL problem.
Stuff happens. Apple had some silly security problems too, much more recently than 2006. And Android is so full of holes, it's a wonder the platform works at all.However, when the generalized public buys a NAS product - the vendor should indicate the potential security problems regarding 'cloud' connections in big bold letters on the box and in the manual and have a large red warning that pops up in the user interface. My guess is most users wouldn't care, but it actually is extremely risky to connect these devices to the wild wild west open Internet. 'It's a worrying meme that you shouldn't even expect your internet-connectible devices to survive the internet, and when they break its your fault.' This has been the go-to techie reaction to security problems since the time of dial-up modems.
It's a bad attitude 1, but it's not a 'meme'. It's the only successful strategy an entire generation of technologically-minded people have found and preached in response to a generation's-worth of terrible software security, slow/absent/can't-be-arsed software providers and under-educated users.Should things be different? Attitudes should be better and the software should be better. But so long as the latter isn't reflected in reality, there isn't much hope for the former.1 It's a bad attitude because blaming the user puts them on the defensive and reduces the chance of any progress being made.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.If you want to buy an off-the-shelf 'home appliance' you will get just that - a product where you cannot update firmware/software, reconfigure security and firewall settings, etc. Maybe it's secure the day you buy it - but in 5 years? With no updates? No way.If you buy something more enterprise grade - or, the best option, roll your own with some of the very good options like FreeNAS or OwnCloud, then you will be able to keep it secure and up-to-date. But this takes more effort - and is likely the reason the OP did not opt for one of these very fine options. 'It's a worrying meme that you shouldn't even expect your internet-connectible devices to survive the internet, and when they break its your fault.'
That's not true - you have an ethernet/network capable device; not an internet capable device - nowhere on the box does it say 'Plug this directly into the open public network in front of your firewall or inside a DMZ. You need to be responsible with your devices. Just because it can serve a web page does not mean it should be accessible over the internet! This is true even with enterprise grade gear.Saying you want to not worry about security at all but still want to put devices on the public internet that need protection is like saying you want to have a car but don't want to ever change it's oil. Sure, you as an individual can avoid changing oil - hire a technician. Same goes with your home network.So no, it's not a bad attitude - it's irresponsible and/or ignorant home users.
That's not true - you have an ethernet/network capable device; not an internet capable device - nowhere on the box does it say 'Plug this directly into the open public network in front of your firewall or inside a DMZ.It pretty much does exactly that. It's marketed and designed for you to open ports directly to it for its various first-party packages, like PhotoStation, CloudStation, WebDAV, etc. I think it's reasonable to expect that those packages, which are major selling points for this system, should be reasonable capable of working on the public Internet.
like PhotoStation, CloudStation, WebDAV,There are secure ways to run things and insecure ways to run things. It's very possible to setup a postfix or exim smtp server as an insecure open relay running on port 25. It's also possible to have either running securely on port 25. And an open port is meaningless by itself. It's the security options applied by the system and application running a service on the port that matter.The examples you give are just applications that run over http or https. Https requires an SSL cert from a trusted CA, and http is a very bad idea for anything that you log into, or that has free access to your home network from the Internet.I imagine most users skip this step.Note, the SSL certificate instructions.You can upload a secure certificate issued by a trusted provider.
After uploading a secure certificate, users can connect to the administration interface of the NAS by SSL connection and there will not be any alert or error message.The error message referred to here is the web browser message indicating that the SSL certificate doesn't match a trusted CA, and therefore your 'secure' NAS connection might be Man-In-The-Middle attacked. And if you don't upload an SSL cert - and connect via http externally - it means that the most amateur of 'bad guys' already has your 30 character username and your 45 digit/character/special character password. You're right, but I'm not sure that we're saying different things. (FWIW, I actually bought an SSL cert just for my Synology DS412+.)We don't have enough information to even guess at what the root problem might be, but I contend that this particular piece of hardware is designed for and meant to live on the open Internet. Yes, that's a very scare place.
But it's not unreasonable to think that an up-to-date Unix server should be capable of the job, especially when it's vendor explicitly sales it on the basis that it is.I'm strongly hoping that the vulnerability turns out to be something already patched in a software update and not a 0-day. That would go a long way toward making me feel better about the situation. But it's not unreasonable to think that an up-to-date Unix server should be capable of the jobYou are right, an up-to-date Unix/Linux server is capable of the job (but still requires routine security maintenance to keep secure!) - however, this home appliance is far from being up-to-date. By design.My CentOS boxes at the office update almost every few days. How often does this appliance update?
Maybe twice if you are lucky. Then how many users are actually applying all updates?
Probably very few.I would further contend that a nas-in-a-box like this can never be secure. The vendor isn't going to update it frequently enough - not enough users will actually update - they are likely using old out-dated/insecure versions of various open source projects or worse, crudely hacked together proprietary projects to run the webserver, webui, ssl layer, authentication, etc. By now, the manufacturer has probably already back-burnered this device and moved onto newer models, or will be shortly - completely abandoning all the current users who will get stuck with a swiss-cheese-in-a-box.I'll go further and content the only safe and secure way to do this is to go with something like FreeNAS or OwnCloud. Both are current projects with massive user-bases. Both are FOSS projects, and both have a corporate backing if you need support or more enterprise features. Both stay very up-to-date with bugfixes, security fixes, and new features rolling out often. Both have upgrade paths from older versions, etc.
Basically, they are much more secure and will stay that way for the life of the project. how often does this appliance update? Once a year?About once a month:Synology uses the same base distro across all their devices, so everyone gets updates at about the same time. The device emails me when a new software version is available.I get what you're saying, but in this case it's totally wrong. They're very active about providing updates to add functionality (even to old systems!) and fix stuff.So back to my original position: this is not an unreasonable thing to expect to be able to run on the Internet. It's a modern Linux box that gets monthly updates, designed with the explicit intention of providing secure services over the public Internet.
It would absolutely suck if that proved not to be the case. , turn off 'EZ-Internet' and other DynDNS-like services, make sure it's connected to your router and not directly to the Internet, don't forward any ports, don't enable DMZ or similar functionality on your router,Best practices only if you do not want to access your data outside of your local network – and that is probably no longer the standard case since data you cannot access from mobile devices etc. Is pretty useless. And for compliance and security reasons, many users and companies cannot legally use cloud services and have to therefore to use a 'private cloud', i.e., some local server, for example a NAS accessible from the Internet. A manual configuration is of course recommendable but in the end, a 'private cloud' has to be exposed to the Internet and you have to trust your software vendor. The most you can usually do is to protect your LAN by putting your 'private cloud' in a DMZ (although for consumers, that is usually not an option since consumer routers do not offer a real DMZ). Never expose it to the internet.
Use a VPN if you have to access from outside your network. Most home routers support vpn;s so there is no reason not to2. You should always have 3 copies of data, 1 working, 1 local back and 1 geo diverse backup (i.e a spideroak, crashplan, or even a friends house) Most people forget the 3rd but what happens if your house burns down?3.
You should have a completely cold backup of important data, this could be a external hard drive that is only plugged in when backups are done, DVD's, Tape Drive, or something else, but what ever it is it should not be accessible to the system with out manual intervention, this will prevent scripts from deleting everything. Well, the reset switch usually causes the bootloader to reformat the volatile partition of the flash.But there's nothing to stop an attacker from rewriting the 'write protected' areas like e.g. A firmware update does.Consider that many routers these days come with NAS or MediaServer functionality. And thus are a valid target for hackers.Furthermore, they are often directly connected to the Internet, and there have been numerous remote-root exploits for cheap chinese knock-offs as well as for highly praised manufacturers like AVM. SSL Strip still works and banks don't care about anything other than providing the illusion of security and standard SSL.Take for example an old lady down the road who somehow got some futuristic malware on her router.
She goes to Bing to search for Wells Fargo to do some online banking (and you know that there is a huge portion of users who only browse the web this way). Hypothetical malware then just runs SSLStrip over the page from bing.com which isn't served over ssl because Microsoft values their bottom line over your privacy and security, which then replaces the link to the https site with http, the router acts as a proxy between http and https so wellsfargo.com is none the wiser. Evil hacker now has poor old lady's password and transfers the money in her account to his own foreign bank account.This hypothetical scenario is doable even running off of a slow router while not using many more resources than the parental keyword filtering uses.
At no point does SSL ever come into play and the top 4 Banks in America (Chase, Citibank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo) don't use HSTS so there's no real way to protect their users from SSLStrip unless a browser includes them in some force SSL list. SSL Strip still works and banks don't care about anything other than providing the illusion of security and standard SSL.Speaking as a security officer for a (non-US) bank, this is not true.We use EV certificates (to increase visibility vs.
Standard certs), deployed HSTS over a year ago on most of our propierties, force HTTPS and pin keys wherever we can (i.e. Mobile apps). And even if a session is compromised: transactions are screened and verified before execution.Yes, our chief concern remains the bottom line. Pushing for more trust increases our user base. Fighting fraud avoids compensation payments. Building awareness and implementing technical measures aids both of these goals, so we get to spend a reasonable amount on both. I'm not sure that's entirely fair.
No internet device is infallible. Other NAS vendors have had similar levels of bugs leading to exploits.QNap 1, FreeNas 2, WDC 3 and Seagate 4 for example all have their own issues.
Added to that, any device that is inscurely configured as default 5 is going to get hacked.FreeNas is open source. It has exploits, though notably easier for savvy customers to dig into why they got hacked in the first place.The real question here is why people need to expose their NAS drives to the internet. I personally don't have a fast enough internet connection to make hosting anything useful. Notably I did try and share my photos with friends and family, but the upload on my DSL is so dire it was a painful experience for all involved.- 1- 2- 3- 4- 5.
Plex is a well-known software solution that allows you to build your own home library of videos, images, and music for playback on any multimedia device sharing the network. Think of it as your own personal Netflix that you host right in your own bedroom or living room. Although there’s always the option of hosting the Plex server off your PC, the changing usage conditions and on-off states of a PC make this less than ideal.
For this purpose, you’ll need a network-attached storage (NAS) solution that works as a consistent, always-ready server for any smartphone, tablet, laptop or desktop PC on the network to access stored media for consumption. A NAS is effectively a normal computer but simplified, usually being much smaller than a traditional tower PC and focusing the majority of its logic board real estate on hard drive connections. However, there are some pretty interesting and industrial-level NAS models out there that take things well beyond the home theater aspect and into the scale of public access for employees, clients and guests in general. You’d be surprised at how often NAS technology is implemented wherever you go.
Might be Interesting: Reviews of the Best NAS for Plex Servers in 2020If the over-two-grand QNAP solution is a little overkill for your taste, don’t worry — home-worthy solutions abound with comfy price tags and easy-to-setup configurations that support just about everything your sanctuary could need.Synology is a prime competitor in the NAS development game, and QNAP users constantly cite comparisons between the two brands. We’re not here to say which brand is better. What we will confer upon you is the understanding that 2GB of DDR3L-1866 RAM and the dual-core Celeron J3355 clocked in tight at 2GHz are worthy contenders on the NAS market. It supports up to 24TB of raw storage across two bays, and the RAM can be bumped up to a healthy 6GB if needed.The transcoding supports 4K with H.264 (AVC) and H.265 (HEVC) at 30FPS, which is ample for high-quality home entertainment under the condition that you have a little time to wait out the buffer.
We say this because in all honesty, it’s fully expected that you won’t have a Celeron knocking 4K media out cold.User experience varies by individual, and there are many great reviews, but keep in mind that 4K — especially at high bit rates — may be problematic for the CPU, and that’s before we discuss the hit that cheaper drives on this level can take to the I/O threshold. Verdict. NoneNow we’re talking serious business here. QNAP’s offering comes with utile-looking HDD bay grilles in a tactical black chassis and simplified frontal interface.It’s not much different than the last two products, but it definitely says “ power” with a certain sternness. Sold up as “ professional-grade“, it brings a quad-core Celeron N3150 with Quick Sync at 1.6GHz and 4GB of DDR3L distributed across two SoDIMM interfaces that support up to 1,600MHz. Once again, the promise of 4K H.264 is seen in the device specifications; the difference is that it appears to actually work on this model. Of note is the dual HDMI outs, which open up an array of mirroring and extension options for multiple displays. You can effectively use this as a replacement PC if you so choose, which not every NAS can do well.Most of the issues that people are finding with this NAS is unrelated to the inherent design of the machine itself, and reviewers are mainly concerned with the lack of new software features from prior versions.
However, you may find that the HDMI ports are crutching on outdated architecture and will struggle to support the HD content that’s expected of, well, an HDMI cable. The HDMI ports are low-qualityQNAP comes in strong with its signature horsepower-driven edge on hardware as shown with 4 GB DDR3L RAM out of the box next to a quad-core Celeron J3455 that’s clocked at 1.5 GHz base with Turbo Boost up to 2.3 GHz when fewer cores are utilized.This is supposed to support hardware transcoding of up to 4K content, so you’re getting a well-rounded punch on horsepower with this unit. Of course, that means the HDMI port on board is also capable of supporting 4K, but we don’t expect you to be quite as excited about that part.There’s also a SATA III interface for 3.5-inch drives of up to 6 Gbps, two gigabit Ethernet ports for planet-to-planet teleportation, and an inbuilt speaker just in case you didn’t bring your own. You have access to a single PCIe port for 10 Gb Ethernet compatibility, which means you can effectively download the whole solar system in a flash and host it from your exabyte hard drive in about 100 years.
There are also system snapshots to keep the system and its data groomed in case you mistakenly muck up some of your files. Yep — the whole hard- and software package is here, and it’s as good as ever.You may find that the fan noise with this unit is a little over-the-top, which some cite as a deal-breaker in this model. However, the main problems, few and far between as they may be, are software-related and seem to boil down to some unresolved conflicts within the code.
More than likely, it’s all thanks to the 0’s and 1’s leaning toward the outdated side of things, which some users feel is cause for running virtual containers to host your servers. A bigger issue is the little stuff — you know, like updating the metadata on your photos, music, and videos.
With those points out of the way, this is a solid machine at a good price, and don’t let the Celeron fool you: It’s more than adequate to handle multitasking arrangements while running virtual machines and hosting containerized servers. That’s rather impressive as these aren’t feats that every NAS with this hardware is able to manage.
Whatever QNAP did right with this one, they did it well. Of course, that could explain the incredible fan noise that some find with their unit. We wholly recommend this NAS if you can keep it someplace where that won’t be an issue. Weak CPU may cause slowdowns when transcoding certain codecs at certain bit ratesDelivered in a sterile-looking, almost offensively bright chassis, this NAS borrows from near-identical design language as its other QNAP siblings.While the CPU doesn’t look stellar at first, the Quick Sync feature should make up for the dual-core 1.6GHz, and in typical server fashion, it appears to be designed with ’round-the-clock efficiency on that note. Packing 2GB of DDR3L RAM out of the box, the device can be upgraded to support up to 8GB like. The TS-251A is cited as ideal for centralized management, allowing you to store everything from text files to audio and more with access through USB or the network according to your needs. As a Plex server, we think this is pitched as more of a business solution, but there’s no reason off the top of our heads that this couldn’t double over as an entertainment server on the side.
That’s all the more evidenced by the H.264 codec support combined with 4K hardware transcoding, which is an impressive spec on paper. H.265 would’ve made this a more formidable machine, however.One of the issues that some people are finding with QNAP’s machine here is the lack of processing power despite Quick Sync’s transcoding acceleration. A simple truth about CPUs is that hardware acceleration only goes so far before the inherent bottlenecks of general processing become apparent, and Celerons are definitely not high-end processors by any means.The idea with a server architecture is that processing efficiency is as important as the effectiveness because servers are left on constantly. It seems that QNAP may have undercut the CPU effectiveness here not just with a Celeron but an unreasonably underpowered one at that. We’re not asking for a 12-core Xeon, folks; we just want the 4K promise lived up. The CPU is more than a little underwhelming with high bit-rate transcoding, especially at higher resolutions, but not everyone experiences thisNow this feels a little more like home entertainment. With a remote control included right out of the box, you already know there’s some serious business involved on the comfort level.The chassis is a funky mix of stylish and functional, bearing a USB 3.1 port on the front alongside the hardware keys and colorful status lights in a carbon color-schemed shell.Running on hardware transcoding, supporting up to 6Gbps (bits, not bytes) SATA drives and capable of handling gigabit LAN, this is a formidable NAS.
The TS-251+ comes in two types that combine two- or four-bay HDD parking with 2-8GB of RAM. This is clearly designed to be straddled across home- and business-level applications.QNAP packed a quad-core 2GHz Celeron with Quick Sync under the hood, and the memory bays support classic DDR3 or DDR3L SoDIMMs for up to 8GB total as restricted by the logic board. The 8GB is an acceptable ceiling if a little low for industrial use, and pushing low-voltage RAM out of the box — as many servers tend to — suggests that the machine is initialized for low-end users. The good news is, you always have the option of swapping the RAM out for a competitive brand such as Crucial.
You’re also getting Virtualization Station and Container Station in typical QNAP style, which allows you to run simultaneous Windows- and Linux-based VMs with containerized apps.Downsides to note are that the TS-251+ tends to cut out every so often, dropping the Plex server and axing surveillance footage. It also tends to lose its IP address on the network, forcing you to replug the Ethernet line to gain its footing once more.
You’ll also want to ensure that this little machine has plenty of breathing room; the Celeron makes it a little hot inside the chassis. Software may not play so nice with PlexWith yet another QNAP to review, we’re now looking at a four-bay offering with the usual rigmarole: quad-core Celeron, 2GB DDR3L RAM at a maximum of 8GB, Virtualization Station for VM instances and Surveillance Station to use the NAS as a storage solution for on-premises feeds.There’s no mention of 4K codecs here, so it looks like this NAS will be sticking to good ol’ 1080p, which is still sufficient for most people. Also worth noting is the inclusion of AirPlay support for Apple devices in addition to Chromecast and Bluetooth, making this a mighty fine wireless option for your home server needs. Again, tends to drop out of network environments, cutting off surveillance feeds and ditching Plex connections in the processTaking a radical dive in QNAP’s design language, you now have this tiny box with a readout screen and a very utile-looking set of HDD bays — four of them.The price tag should tell you up-front that this is poised to be an excellent Plex solution on the enterprise level in addition to other features. And QNAP is no slouch when it comes to on-board software features for surveillance, virtual machines and other needs that a server ideally fills.From the outset, the inclusion of Real-Time Remote Replication (RTRR) already screams “ made for businesses“.
It’s a feature that allows business-level backups to be performed in real time, and you can manage to share content as needed.Geared for 10Gbps Ethernet with a uniquely efficient storage environment makes 4K I/O and transmission a breeze provided the correct drives and connection are available. This thing is even promoted for use as a standard PC with QvPC on board to let it run locally for the user in addition to background server support. Of course, it wouldn’t be a great NAS without full-volume AES 256-bit encryption to boot. Here’s a pleasant surprise: It doesn’t use an Intel Celeron this pass around. Instead, it relies on an Intel Core i3 clocked at 3.5GHz and split into two cores. This runs next to 4GB of DDR3 — not the low-power stuff but the normal, performance-grade material — that can be expanded up to 16GB, which is considered an optimal figure for enterprise-level NAS systems, especially if you’re running high-grade Plex operations on board.
To top it all off, you have the ever-expected HDMI port, which would have been a real bummer to leave out on such a nice device. Surveillance suite is expensive and inefficient. 2GB of RAM out of the box is a little weak for what this machine was designed to handleTaking things yet another notch higher, you have the TVS-682: a beast of a machine with a beast of a price tag.The first detail you’ll take note of is the incremental design bump from the, which seems to be a trend leading from one model to the next.This one, almost as small as the last, now has two dedicated SSD ports in addition to the four inbuilt HDD bays, totaling six drives for high-speed, high-capacity storage and I/O operations. In addition, you have an Intel Core i3-6100 (Skylake) clocked at 3.7GHz, 8GB of DDR3 RAM right out of the box and three PCIe expansion slots to add a little functionality on the side. The first drawback to look out for is the lack of file versioning in this particular system, which makes it a little too easy to accidentally overwrite a file with a branched version that stemmed from the same original copy. Rather than consolidate the files or otherwise separate them, it mashes them together and causes the second upload to walk over the first, resulting in losses to the first set of edits that were uploaded.This is almost unforgivable in a machine that costs as much as the 682, but with Plex servers, it might be acceptable since overwrites are more prolific with PDFs and text documents — in other words, items that are frequently updated.
In addition, you’re getting three PCIe slots for custom expansion, four-LAN support and a 10G-ready system with iSCSI to boot.Now, you’re probably wondering about the downsides, and there’s, unfortunately, one area that the manufacturer Q-napped on: general quality. The system works great, but many users cite that the fans are unacceptably loud. Yes, it’s understood that with a Core i7 under the hood along with so much RAM and up to 12 drives, there’s a lot of thermal to distribute, but for one fan to work so hard at regulating all of this was a terrible mistake in the opinion of some.For us, we think that it’s frown-worthy but not necessarily a deal-breaker; after all, not everyone plans to keep it in rooms that will be frequented. On the other hand, as a Plex device, the noise could be a problem.
Now, we don’t expect anyone to use this in a house. The hardware is pitched as a definite enterprise-level machine that’s designed to push professional results out, but Plex servers are designed for entertainment and therefore aren’t taken as seriously as the servers that are usually kept buried in server rooms.What we’re trying to say is that as a Plex server, it’ll do wonderfully with 4K transcoding and delivery, but it could create a problem for any environment where it’s kept because of the sheer whine that’s created by the fan. It’s cited as unbearable and enough that the whole system needs to be quarantined to a separate room entirely to deal with it, but then again, not everyone has this issue.
A fairly significant number of users report that the fan whine is seriously harshAre you looking for an alternative to your? Did you really think there were other quality offerings on the market that break the mold of our favored dichotomy?Well, you might have been right about that one: Thecus brings a solid multifunctional unit to the table that supports 4K transcoding and playback, inbuilt malware protection and superb customer support to boot. Thecus’ product is sold through an authorized reseller, SerenIT, so there’s more comfort to fill your soles with should you feel uncertain about purchasing anything that isn’t “mainstream” enough. The system comes with ThecusOS 7.0, which in addition to the malware protection should help you steer clear of anything that might try to get ahold of your data. The starting price, at least before you haggle SerenIT’s service reps, is a little on the high side considering the upper limits of the unit’s hardware modifications and the lack of AndroidPacking a quad-core Celeron, 2GB of RAM and 112MB/s on read and write speeds, this server is a standard beginning hardware choice for hosting a Plex multimedia environment.The CPU isn’t exceptional, but this isn’t intended for enterprise-level use. Surprisingly, the AS3202T comes with an onboard DAC for high-quality audio decoding through the USB hub, and it supports the H.265 codec for punching out 4K HDR content through HDMI 1.4b. You have two- and four-port varieties to choose from, which can be complemented with a RAID 0, 1 or 10 setup as you please.From the surface, this is already sizing up to be a decent recommendation in the multimedia hosting realm that slides in on an acceptable price tag.
However, there are a couple small details that are worth noting. This machine isn’t especially good at knocking out high bit-rate transcoding on videos at 1080p and beyond, and this gets worse as you scale up on the resolution. You may also run into complications with the power plug falling out easily although this appears to be a minority complication.A number of users have cited that the machine as a whole tends to lag with music and video in addition to terrible app support to these ends, raising the question of ASUSTOR’s software choices as they pertain to bottlenecks in the system. Verdict.
Some say that the DAC is wasted on this device due to poor software support on audio and video playback. The Celeron struggles with high bit-rate 1080p video, which only becomes more limiting as you attempt to transcode up to 4KWell, here’s a new name in the NAS game: TerraMaster. Is it terrifying? Is it the master NAS unit? We’re not entirely convinced, but all accounted, it looks like a reasonable unit for the price. At a relatively conservative price tag, you’re getting an expected hardware bundle with 2 GB of low-power RAM and a Celeron that’s advertised at 2.41 GHz.We emphasize the point that it’s advertised because Celerons that are used in NAS units are normally around the 1.2-1.8 GHz range as base frequencies while the mid-2’s are the Turbo Boost results, and you can never really count on the CPU consistently running that high because they’re not rated to run consistently at anything better than their original clock on average. This raises a red flag on Terramaster’s marketing scheme, but we digress.
The HDD interface — unspecified, we’ll add — is said to run at a “ blazing fast 110 MBps“, which we’re here to tell you isn’t impressive today but might’ve passed some high marks about six years ago. This lends the impression that the NAS is actually outdated on the whole and hasn’t had its specifications updated in recent years.However, it does have some of the must-have niftiness that you expect of a reasonably contemporary NAS:. BTRFS file system. AES hardware encryption. Compatibility with smart TVsOh, you’re confused about that last part? Yeah, we were just speculating that this unit might be particularly outdated, and now it’s all contemporary suddenly. It’s almost like TerraMaster exaggerated on the hardware capabilities twice in one pass.
We bet you really want to buy this product now!Want to hear something else? The customer service for this product is almost nil. It’s a little higher than that — around the zero, nothing and nada marks to be exact.
We’re not saying it’s a bad product because all accounted, the ratings are pretty good and the offerings are fairly solid for the price, but we’re putting on our tinfoil hats to call shenanigans on TerraMaster’s attitude toward customers. Suspiciously misleading specifications sheet.
Customer service is forgettableWe’ll bet you didn’t know that Netgear made NASes! Well, okay, it is expected that Netgear would make network-based equipment, and that’s what a NAS is after all.Say what you like about your past experiences with Netgear equipment, but this looks like a solid offering across the board, and the price cleaves on a cool spot for the out-of-box performance although we question how a RISC processor will handle NAS operations, especially in the long run. RISC CPUs, which are typically found in smartphones and tablets, aren’t designed to handle heat to the same extent that the traditionally fan-cooled CISC Celerons and Atoms are designed to; as such, being RISC, there’s a potential risk — sorry, had to — with regards to performance and longevity. However, the whole package looks promising.The CPU, which is a Cortex A15, was a solid piece of tech back in the early 2010’s.
RISC CPUs aim to leverage efficient coding procedures and lightweight OS requirements to make up for the ultra-low-power throughput, which intuitively leads to less potent processing oomph in the bigger picture. While RISCs aren’t known for failing any more frequently than their CISC brethren, they’re usually placed in units that aren’t cooled by anything but sheer contact with stagnant air, so we’re left to wonder how in the world you’re supposed to transcode media in 2020 with a tablet-level processor from 2012.Then again, with a little awesomeness behind your software, anything is possible with hardware, and it looks like Netgear’s ReadyNAS is a reliable unit for up to 1080p transcoding. Of course, 4K would be a little much to expect given the power inside.Other technical points to take note of are the dual gigabit Ethernet ports for double throughput in Link Aggregation mode, the usual and expected BTRFS file system on board and native Plex support to boot. This all comes backed up with, which uses a portal for secure access on Windows, Mac, Android or iOS.
You can set up a private cloud for backing up your data or as an extension to your NAS’ physical storage. We’d say that’s a major benefit for anyone who’s trying to host for their home or office environment.
It’s a CPU-intensive process, and Plex servers are largely centered on transcoding operations to be successful, so you’ll need a fairly competent CPU in your Plex NAS to make it hum. Hardware AccelerationThis is nothing more or less than having a dedicated piece of hardware to boost processing power in specific situations or with specific tasks. This is normally achieved with co-processors, graphics processing units (GPUs) and specialized RAM that occupies a noncontiguous area of the logic board apart from the normal memory that would be used for general applications. When looking for hardware to deck out your Plex NAS with, you’ll want transcoding hardware acceleration on your CPU if you can.
NASNetwork-attached storage (NAS) is storage space that’s accessible through a local internet connection. This is used by enterprises to compartmentalize storage solutions according to user sets, allowing specific profiles and devices to gain access to this storage for reading or writing.As it pertains to using Plex on a NAS, you’d install Plex to the NAS itself or on interacting client devices so the contents of the NAS can be transcoded and distributed to other devices on the local network.
A NAS with a potent CPU is ideal for Plex transcoding, which in turn is essential for distribution to your media devices. CPUThe central processing unit (CPU) is a hardware component that forms the brain of the system, processing all inputs into corresponding outputs. CPUs are never as linear as just clock frequency (gigahertz GHz) or the number of cores involved.There are finer architectural differences such as caches, pipelines, instruction sets and more that define the CPU’s overall ability to function effectively with different types of information. For example, some people excel at math while others excel at spatial recognition, critical thinking, and risk assessment. It is in this way that CPUs are similarly categorized and equipped to systems that require specific processing strengths. RAMRandom access memory (RAM) is temporary storage space for apps, programs or media that have been recently accessed and are being held open so you can pick up where you left off.
![]()
When you’re shopping for hardware to deck out your NAS with, RAM isn’t all that important with a Plex server, but it’s still essential for the system to run in the first place. HDD, SSD, RPM and Bit RateThe hard drive disk (HDD) stores data that’s accessed at a rate determined partially by rotations per minute (RPM). There are other determinants involved such as the actual quickness that the drive can read and write data at the given RPM as primely exampled by Western Digital’s Red drives, which are designed specifically for NAS systems.You’ll want plenty of server space to store your media for transcoding and distribution, and an HDD with a higher RPM will be able to deliver the goods to the CPU more quickly for this purpose.
HDDs on Plex servers are usually a minimum of 1TB at 7,200RPM. If you happen to be using a solid state drive (SSD), the data rate will be measured in Mbps (megabits per second) and will typically be much faster than an HDD.
RAIDRedundant arrays of independent disks (RAID) are a means of combining multiple HDDs or SSDs so they function as a unified or contiguous hardware entity. This is normally done through RAID 0 (“striping”) or RAID 1 (“mirroring”). The former setup evenly distributes data across both drives to double the read and write speeds while the latter simply mirrors the data of the first drive to the second one. Both are important to Plex NAS servers because a slow drive can bottleneck the delivery of media content to connected devices while a drive failure can result in total data loss. For this reason, a four-drive RAID 10 array is recommended to combine the benefits of both RAID configurations, but your server can still function perfectly fine without it. Plex NAS FAQ What hardware is ideal for a NAS that’s running Plex?For home use, you’re recommended to have 1GB of RAM for every 1TB of storage and a minimum of 1TB to hold your media for hosting.
You should also have a minimum CPU of an Intel Core i3, preferably of the latest generation. When you step into enterprise-level hosting, those specifications take intuitive leaps upstream: Intel Core i7, 16GB RAM and at least 8TB storage depending on the exact purpose of the server and what will be hosted.However, these are general figures and won’t necessarily account for increased needs in cases where you need an inordinately larger amount of storage, more CPU to handle a larger number of clients and so on. Fortunately, a Plex NAS is capable of running smoothly on as little as a Pentium Celeron, 200GB of storage and 512MB of RAM. These are really small figures in the grand scheme, but if you opt for a Plex server strictly for sharing text files and SHD video, it’ll prove well-enough rounded to handle your needs.
How do I get my NAS hooked up to my other devices?You’ll need to install Plex Server on a PC and use this to set up the NAS itself remotely on the network. After that, you should install the Plex app on your Apple and Android devices to link up with the NAS on the same local network that it’s on.
The media will be received through the Plex app for viewing on your device. You will, of course, need to plug the NAS into the network with an Ethernet cable or WiFi connection. Ethernet is recommended if you’re working with larger files such as 4K video, RAW audio and photography, or large portfolios of PDF data.
Can I add more media to my NAS to expand what Plex can deliver?You should be able to forward information to the NAS using the Plex app or the USB connections on the NAS itself. Since you’ll require an interface to authorize transfers, the USB trick normally doesn’t work unless the machine is configured to automatically copy the contents of attached drives or you tether it directly to your PC using an adapter. Are there any devices or software combinations that won’t work with a Plex-loaded NAS?Every device should work with a Plex-loaded NAS.
Apple, Android, Linux and Windows devices of all operating environments should work just fine, including all versions of all browsers and media players. The idea behind a NAS transcoder is that any file format can be tailored to the requirements of client devices whether the restraints are on resolution, bit rate, file type or codec levels.
However, the more transcoding that the NAS has to do to satisfy all the clients’ specific needs, the more powerful your CPU will need to be. Why is my media buffering constantly?This is normally due to a bottleneck in the network, drive speed or CPU. For most cases, the CPU, in particular, will be the problem, and it’ll owe to transcoding woes while the system works out what you’re viewing the content on and what format it needs to be delivered in as a result. The simplest solution is to upgrade the offending component if you can work out what’s causing the choke. Refer to the first question in this section for clarification on what you should use to ensure a smooth experience. Bear in mind that having more clients connected to the Plex NAS may result in network- and CPU-based slowdowns.
If there’s a minimal pinch of RAM in the system while a variety of different media is being accessed, the storage drive and RAM may also become choke points. ConclusionAt the bottom of it all, a NAS is really just a PC that’s designed to support other computer devices rather than be used directly by the user. As such, the hardware under the hood is designed to run constantly, which means low heat, low noise and low power consumption.This can be difficult to pull off while maintaining a reasonable amount of processing power, which is why hardware acceleration is important to the successful transcoding operations of a Plex NAS. Without the acceleration, transcoding becomes a difficult matter that can make or break the Plex experience, and as you now know, a Plex NAS absolutely depends on transcoding to be worthwhile.
Keep in mind that while Plex is used mainly as a multimedia server mediation and management solution, it can and sometimes is used in a business environment for sharing data among coworkers, management, and trainees. This can occur in the form of training videos.In a similar vein of thinking, colleges and universities might use a Plex server to distribute media to students on their desired multimedia device.
This media would, of course, take the form of course recaps and videos. Basically, any application that involves hosting audio or visual media — even text files — can be used in some practical capacity with Plex servers.Going forward, you can expect to see what we’ve always seen: more improvements to processing power, memory, and storage capacity. These are the same upgrades that you’ll see to your smartphone, tablet, and PC because, well, NAS systems are PCs at the end of the day. You might wonder if there will ever be a day when we’ll see a server solution that can be hosted from a smartphone, and while it conceptually sounds like a logical step at some point, we’re not there yet.Concerns with battery life, processing power, and data plans are interfering with the concept; at best, it can only be realized with text files and other small media at the moment.For now, it’s hard to argue with a small box that you keep in the corner of your room on a desk. However, you always have the option of simply running a Plex server straight off your PC or laptop if you so choose.
Just keep in mind that the experience likely won’t be as fluid, and if you should ever shut the system off, you’ll lose your server connection. Hello Albert,Yes, this and other NAS discussed in this article support many additional features. Most of them are free. For example, karaoke you mentioned in QNAP TS-253A is free. But to use some features, you need to buy a license.
But at the same time, for basic purposes – and that’s why most people buy NAS to begin with – you don’t need to purchase additional licenses. I also want to point out that any additional programs will consume NAS resources and may slow it down significantly. Therefore, when installing a program, make sure you really need it.Best regards.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |